Breaking: In Unexpected Move, Police Chief MacIsaac Announces Retirement

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Belmont Police Chief James MacIsaac

In a surprise move, Belmont Police Chief James MacIsaac announced his retirement from his post effective Aug. 25.

“After much reflection, I have decided that the time has come to move on,” MacIsaac said in a one-page letter dated Aug. 6 to the town’s Select Board.

“Serving Belmont has been the honor of a lifetime, and I am deeply grateful for the trust, support, and friendships I have experienced along the way,” he said.

“Chief MacIsaac has served our community with honor, dedication, and integrity since 1999, and has been an invaluable part of our police department’s leadership. Chief MacIsaac is also a proud resident of our community, making his commitment even more personal and impactful,” said Patrice Garvin, Belmont Town Administrator reacting to the announcement.

Hired as a police officer in 1999, the lifelong Belmont resident was appointed by the Select Board in December 2019 after many years as Assistant Chief under Richard McLaughlin. Right off the bat, MacIsaac faced the COVID shutdown and the impact on police/public relations of the George Floyd murder a few months later.

“The most effective way we can build trust between the police and the community is for us to get to know one another. I, and the members of the Belmont Police Department, will always make ourselves available to anyone who has concerns or questions regarding operations, tactics and how we interact with the public,” said MacIsaac in a letter to the community in May 2020.

MacIsaac was outfront as the public face of law enforcement in the racially-based murder of Henry Tapia on Upland Street in January 2021, winning praise for his willingness to engage with the affect communities.

Also under MacIsaac’s watch saw the Police Department in 2023 depart from Civil Service, something he had advocated for many years. In recent months, a series of violent gun incidents – including one which a man was wounded by gunfire – and other incidents have increased concerns from residents on being safe in Belmont.

MacIsaac was in the first year of a new three-year contract approved last year which began Jan. 1, 2025 and ran through Dec. 31. 2027. His base salary was $225,000 under the contract with annual cost of living adjustments and merit pay reviews.

MacIsaac is Belmont’s 12th full-time chief since David Chenery, Jr. was named Superintendent of Highways and Police Chief in 1877.

“I have been truly fortunate to call Belmont both my home and my place of work,” said MacIsaac.

Following past precedent, the Select Board will appoint a Police Chief Screening Committee which will whittle down candidates to a pair of finalists. After a public interview, the Board will vote on a new police chief.

Mid-Summer Special Town Meeting: Mixed Messages From Non-Binding Rink Vote

By Leave a Comment

Photo: The Belmont rink under construction

It was a long night at Belmont’s remote mid-summer Special Town Meeting – three-and-a-half hours long – Wednesday, July 23, ending with a mixed message from members. Supporters of the “Save the Skip” article, who sought to transfer the name of the former rink to the new recreation facility, claimed victory as the measure passed on a 128-56-44 roll-call vote, solidifying their assertion of a mandate to place the James “Skip” Viglirolo moniker on the new rink.

“With the rank nearing completion, it is more important than ever to affirm the name … and keep honoring his legacy, not only for him, but for a town that honors its history and the people that made Belmont the wonderful place it is to live, learn and experience,” said Gail Harrington, Viglirolo’s daughter and lead campaigner of the “Save the Skip” citizens’ petition.

While the “yes” vote was celebrated online, it has little real impact on the near-future naming of the $32 million facility, which is set to open in November. In answering the all-important question facing the citizens’ petition, Crowley said the results of the “Save the Skip” article would be deemed non-binding after a review by Town Counsel Mina Makarious of Anderson & Kreiger, and “advisory” rather than a directive to make the change. A new name will be dictated by the newly-installed Belmont Asset Naming Policy approved by the Select Board on July 7.

Despite the positive outcome, any request to consider naming the new rink after Viglirolo can not be taken up until June 2026, at the anniversary of Skip’s death, which is prescribed under the naming guidelines.

The advisory nature of the vote may have contributed to the high number of members-nearly one in five-who selected “abstain” as their preference, declining to vote either for or against the article. Adding those to the members voting against the measure, the ‘yes’ margin shrank to 56 percent.

“I didn’t want to be voting against Skip [Viglirolo],” said one abstained voter at a local coffee shop the morning after the vote. “But the town has a naming policy and that’s how it should done.”

Town Moderator Mike Crowley said holding a Town Meeting in the middle of beach and vacation season was indeed “an odd time.” Still, Massachusetts State Law requires municipalities to hold a “special” Town Meeting 45 days after the petitioners crossed a 200-signature threshold. 

“To be fair to the petitioners, they didn’t want to have it in midsummer but the fall special town meeting [in October],”said Crowley.

Before the debate, Crowley made a special appeal to members that while members “may have differences from time to time in opinions … we can be polite in our dealings with each other.”

In the days before the meeting, town and elected officials received communications and statements online attacking their perceived positions on the naming of the new rink. On Monday, July 21, Belmont resident Wendy Murphy wrote a provocative opinion piece in the Boston Herald alleging the “Selectboard” [sic] – dubbed “Belmont Royals” – as havinganimus towards Italians by supporting the new naming policy. That was followed by an email from the 8,000-member Italian American Alliance, which condemned the “Selectboard” for its “most questionable and insulting action” that, it contends, “is, quite frankly, viewed as Italian HATE.”

Crowley said he did not want that kind of divisive discussion during the debate, noting it was “disrespectful to both the petitioners and the town officials.”

Leading off the meeting, Harrington explains the history of the “Save the Skip” petition. After the former rink was taken down in 2023, the Select Board received many letters in support of placing the Viglirolo name on the new rink, said Harrington, but their requests to have the Select Board address their applications in 2024 and 2025 “were ignored.” 

Seeking a public discussion on transferring the name, Harrington and supporters submitted a citizens’ petition in early July with 258 signatures to show the broad support in retaining the name. Harrington emphasizes that the petition is not seeking exclusive naming rights to the rink, but rather to honor Skip’s legacy as an important, long-time Belmont Recreation Department employee, athlete, and coach, who created safe and accessible winter recreation options for all residents. Two such programs included creating a girls’ recreation hockey program in the early 1980s, as well as an inclusionary program for special needs children that evolved into the Belmont/Watertown SPORTS program.

“Legacies matter for individuals, for families, communities, and for the town of Belmont,” said John Feeley, a long-time resident who addressed Town Meeting. “No one could deny that ‘Skip’ Viglirolo’s legacy is immense and worthy of praise and admiration. It should be Belmont’s honor to continue paying homage to the legacy of ‘Skip’ Viglirolo. Please, let’s get this right, and please put his name on the new rink where it deserves to be seen again.”

However, before the meeting could discuss the article, it faced a late amendment. Submitted by Angus Abercrombie (Precinct 8), the amendment would eliminate the article’s language and replace it with a statement “expressing Town Meeting support for the town asset naming policy as amended by the Select Board at their July 7th meeting, and ask that it be applied to the Belmont Rink and Sports Facility.”

“What I want to avoid is the injection of Town Meeting into this process where it will just serve to take time and resources from other priorities while creating more divisiveness,” Abercrombie said. In a curious approach to debate, Crowley allowed members to speak on both the amendment and the main article simultaneously. 

Select Board member Elizabeth Dionne, the primary author of the new naming policy, presented a detailed timeline for 2025 during which no naming decisions was made during the winter, “as our focus is on complying with the MBTA Communities Act, taking state-mandated action on Accessory Dwelling Units, and preparing a balanced, revenue-based budget for Annual Town Meeting.”

Dionne said the reason the Select Board did not answer calls from either the Viglirolo family or numerous others who pushed to have the rink or parts of the new facility named to honor important Belmont residents was that they “drafted a naming policy that is fair and balanced, that incorporates best practices from multiple sources.” To do otherwise, she said, would be “throwing due process out the window.”

She noted that supporters of the new naming process are not attempting to cancel either Viglirolo or James White, whose name was on the former High School Field House before it was taken down to build the new rink. “These names will have a prominent position in the new rink … preserves important aspects of Belmont’s history.”

Dionne “strongly encouraged” [Town Meeting] to support Belmont’s Naming Policy as it prioritizes the name of the Town of Belmont on assets. It also provides an opportunity for all voices to be heard through a formal hearing, honors the past through plaques, signs, and monuments, and “reserves and prioritizes sponsorship rights in a way that can ease the burden on the Town’s operating budget.”

On a personal note, Dionne said she “once again asks [residents] to give us an opportunity to at least consider naming the rink after a woman. Over half of the Town’s population is female, but in 2025, the vast majority of the town and school assets are still named after men. It will be decades before we have a similarly important naming opportunity. …Unfortunately, I doubt that our $32 million rink ultimately will be named for a woman, but please, please give us an opportunity to make our case.”

It was clear early in the hours-long debate that it was one based either on emotional and historic ties to a revered Belmont resident or on the perception of the naming of the facility to the Town’s chief executive body that oversees town policies. 

“This rink was named after Skip, and it was rightfully named after him, and 25 years later, there’s no reason to unnamedit. But that’s not what this is about. [The Select Board] took up the renaming policy and … have total control, and we’reactually looking for income versus our history. I feel like you guys are just throwing away our history to get a little money for a sponsorship, or to put a woman or someone else that property.” – Brian Keefe (Precinct 4)

“Naming rights for the rink have an important economic value. The 2022 Collins Center report said that [the Town] should examine and develop all sources of revenue to reduce the structural deficit. Yet here we are having a vote that would forsake a possible revenue source. I’ll state clearly that I think it’s completely unrealistic to think that we could name the rink [after] ‘Skip’ and then get a corporate sponsor. It will not happen. … I’m confident that the rink naming value is at least in the seven figures.” – Roger Fussa (Precinct 8)

“Some of us who support continuing Skip Viglirolo’s name on the rink have been described as old, nostalgic townies. What we are is residents who respect the contributions that Skip and others like him who selfishly made Belmont what it is, a better community. We do not want our history erased. We do not want the desire for vague amounts of cash and the limits of a 20 year window to determine what our buildings are named. Let’s do what’s right for Belmont, young or old, contemporary or nostalgic newcomer or townie … and keep Skips name on the skating rink. – Anne Marie Mahoney (Precinct 1)

“The important issue is good governance. Good governance prioritizes inclusive deliberation and thoughtful decision making, and in a town where we have little time, because it’s run by volunteers. Standard Operating Procedures is the right way to ensure that this is done. And the Select Board has created such a procedure. … What the petitioners reallywant here is to railroad through their wishes, and they don’t want to wait and participate in the democratic process. Disrespectful and divisive are names being called those people who won’t just let that happen. And it’s working, and I think that’s really worrisome.” – Claus Becker (Precinct 5)

“When a passionate group of citizens attempts to follow the available process [as perscribed in the 2018 naming policy] and that group of citizens is repeatedly, for whatever reason, not given a proper response other than be patient. And when the [naming policy is] changed, right after the group submits their application in good faith, I believe that turning to their Town Meeting representatives as constituents in order to get their voice heard is appropriate. I think community is never built with abstract, correct, well structured principles and processes. Community is built with heart and history andconnection. And so I believe that perfection should not be the enemy of the good, and that we should support the non binding resolution to affirm the 1998 vote to name the rink.” – Anne-Marie Lambert (Precinct 2}

“In 2018, seeing the many new public buildings coming, including the rink, I wanted to get a naming policy in place to avoid contentious and emotional debates like this by having a process with clear objective criteria, including waiting for a year after someone passes to consider their name. We have rules. This matter needs to stay with the Select Board. All of you and others out there can contact the Select Board and advocate for whose name you wish on your own. Of course, Town Meeting can vote to give a non binding opinion to the Select Board, but I doubt it’s going to be unanimous either way tonight, and it doesn’t change the fact that the Select Board has to make the decision under the policy. A split vote from Town Meeting, which is what we’re going to get, is honestly not really all that helpful.” – Adam Dash (Precinct 1)

After the Abercrombie amendment was defeated 76-138-10, Geoff Lubien (Precinct 7) called for the article to be “postponed “indefinitely while allowing the petitioners to resubmit the citizens’ petition with a new set of signatures so it could be debated in the October Special Meeting. The call to table the article narrowly failed 98-114-1. 

With the clock at a quarter to 11 p.m., most members had heard enough, and the meeting sped to the final vote. 

“So Article 3 passes, the non-binding resolution to preserve the name of the former skating rink for the new facility. It is quite late,” said Crowley.

Mid-Summer Special Town Meeting Set: Vote On Rink’s Name Will Be Non-Binding, Select Board Adds Alcohol (Licenses) To The Night

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Gail Harrington

No one wanted the mid-summer Special Town Meeting.

Not the supporters of a citizens’ petition to affirm a 1998 Town Meeting vote naming the Belmont municipal rink after James “Skip” Viglirolo onto the new $32 million replacement. Gail Harrington, Viglirolo’s youngest child and petiton sponsor, said the supporters wanted the question to be included in the warrant for the fall Special Town Meeting taking place in mid-October when they believed it would receive a wider audience and, they believe, a favorible outcome.

And certainly not the Select Board which was “surpised” by the petition and was left scrambling to set the July 23 get together.

“You are likely asking why on earth the Select Board scheduled a Special Town Meeting for July 23? The short answer is that we received a duly certified Citizen Petition, so we had to,” said Board Member Elizabeth Dionne in an email to Town Meeting members.

And not town officials, the Town Moderator, nor members who will (hopefully) attend a remote meeting to vote on the article that, in a judgement by Belmont’s Town Consel, has been rendered toothless as it will be a non-binding referendum.

Maybe that’s why the town decided to bring alcohol to the coming assembly.

But holding the Special in the middle of July was not anyone’s choice but a requirement in the judgement of Town Counsel Mina Makarious of Anderson & Kreiger. It turned out that the family and friends of the late Viglirolo – who died in June – were too successful in securing signatures for their petition. Once the campaigners obtained and submitted more than 200 signatures from registered voters, the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth’s Citizen’s Guide to Town Meetings requires towns to hold a special within 45 days after the petition has been certified by the Town Clerk on June 18.

Makarious concurred with the state regs “that we have no choice but to hold the meeting” within the 45 days, said Dionne.

“The Town Counsel did not give us the answer we were necessarily hoping for,” said newly installed Board Chair Matt Taylor. “It seems like a prudent thing to do … and it sounds like it wasn’t the answer the petitioners wanted either.”

As the July 23 date for the special town meeting was set, it was revealed the vote on transfering the Viglirolo name to the future building will only be an advisory opinion of the members rather than being a requirement to the town after Makarious determined the petitioners argument was based on

“The new rink has no association to the old one, they are two seperate structures,” said Town Administrator Patrice Garvin, boiling down the argument the town had advocated. The town can now follow the newly-created naming policy of town assets – the school committee and the library trustees have their own guidelines – approved by the Select Board at the July 7 meeting.

As the Select Board opened the warrant for July 23, Garvin presented two citizens’ petitions: the aforementioned rink naming article and a request to submit Home Rule legislation to increase the number of alcohol licenses and expand the number of establishments which can obtain them.

“We got an email earlier today saying that the [alcohol licensing] petitioners preferred July 23 if we were going to be having a special town meeting.” said Matt Taylor.

The town’s reasoning for placing the alcohol petition on the July 23 warrant is “to potentially relieve some of the agenda for October [Special Town Meeting], which is already incredibly full,” said Taylor. The article count for the fall Special has passed a dozen which is likely a high water mark for the autominal meeting.

The Select Board and Town Moderator Mike Crowley declared the meeting will be held remotely as “there’s an issue of public convenience and wanting to maximize participation, which I think we could most effectively do with a remote meeting.”

“Difficult to do this as a hybrid as well. I don’t know who would be available to show up in person,” said Crowley. “A full remote meeting, rather than hybrid, which is easier on staff, time and resources. And summer is not an ideal time.”

Once Free, Bulky Items, Mattresses Will Now Cost Residents To Have Them Taken Away

By Leave a Comment

Photo: This will cost you to be removed come July 1 (Credit: Jeffrey M. Vinocur, Wikimedia Commons)

It’s a claim to fame Belmont wants to shed: The Town of Homes is where residents of neighboring towns throw out their threadbare mattresses and large, oversized items at no cost due to Belmont’s tradition of complimentary sidewalk collection.

“We have become the dumping ground for surrounding communities to deposit their mattresses for free,” said Select Board Chair Elizabeth Dionne. And the ‘dump and run’ practice has reached a level beyond a nuisance, said Jay Marcotte, head of Belmont’s DPW.

In a move that Dionne hopes “will stop [Belmont] from bearing externality of other town’s large item trash,” beginning July 1, if you want a mattress, bookcase, or anything that can’t be stuffed into your trash cart, it’s gonna cost you after the Select Board unanimously approved the new fee structure.

Marcotte presented the suggested new payments for three catagories of pickups come July 1.

Change in cost to remove bulky items Prices for Pickups before July 1, 2025Prices for Pickups after July 1, 2025
Mattress/Box springFree$50
Bulk itemsfree (one per week)$40
Appliances$25 $40, $55 for televisions

Marcotte said under the new plan, residents will call the town, which will coordinate the pickup and take the payment. Residents should know that if they contact Waste Management, the town’s waste and recycling provider, to take away a mattress or box spring, it will cost double the town’s rate. The town is working with a outside vendor to recycle each mattress. Marcotte said the new fees will only generate enough revenue to cover the contrasted costs of the vendors.

Waste Management will continue to manage bulk items and appliance pickups under the new payment structure.

Marcotte said information on the updated costs for mattress and bulk item removal will be sent to residents with their next municipal bills and on the DPW’s website.

White Street ‘Ready To Go’ As Select Board OKs 14 Streets In $1.7 Million Pavement Management Plan

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Full-depth reclamation street repair on White Street begins this summer

White Street is at the top of the list of Belmont roadways to be reconstructed and repaved, as the Select Board approved a $1.7 million contract with Newport Construction Corp to undertake the 2025 Pavement Management Program.

Fourteen streets were selected in the contract, with most being “full-depth reclamation” under the PMP contract, according to Wayne Chouinard, Belmont’s Town Engineer. The low bid was approximately $200,000 higher than the estimated job cost, said Chouinard.

White Street in the Waverley neighborhood will be the first to be repaired and repaved, with work scheduled to start mid-July, said DPW Director Jay Marcotte.

“[The roadway] is already marked up and ready to go,” said Marcotte, noting the town hopes to repair White and Waterhouse Road in Winn Brook before the beginning of the school year in September, as each is close to area elementary schools.

The streets that are part of the 2025 PMP plan are:

  • Cushing Avenue
  • Sycamore Street
  • Linden Avenue
  • Shaw Road
  • Laurel Street
  • Underwood Street
  • Oliver Road
  • Marlboro Street
  • Clifton Street
  • Unity Avenue
  • Lake Street
  • Village Hill Road
  • White Street

COA Votes To Delay Transitioning Rec Dept Staff To Beech Street Center; Town, Select Board Has Other Ideas

By Leave a Comment

Photo: The Council on Aging voted 9-1 to delay the transition of three Recreation Department staffers and the Veterans Agent into the Beech Street Center

At first glance, the proposal from town officials to transistion the Recreation Department to the Beech Street Senior Center this fall appears straightforward enough. Due to space needs at Town Hall with the Retirement Board heading to the Homer Building, construction work – including adding a new entry specifically for Recreation Department use – will be performed so three Recreation Department administrative staffers and the town’s Veterans Agent can relocate into a corner of the Beech Street Center as town librarians – in the location temporarily as the new library is being built – are prepared to transfer out. 

While the request didn’t appear to be contentious, don’t tell that to seniors who contend the transition is part of a “power play” by the town to reduce or remove the Council on Aging’s control of the Beech Street Center. Many senior advocates point to last year’s placement of the once-independent Senior Center into the newly-created Community Services Department – which occurred only after a protracted debate – as another example of the town interjecting its will onto its seniors.

“A lot of us see this building as just being prime real estate, and the town is licking its chops and figuring out every scheme it can use to move inside,” said Bob McGaw. The chair of the By-Law Review Committee has spearheaded a successful Citizens Petition with more than 300 signatures to bring an article to the Special Town Meeting inside the annual Town Meeting on May 21 to ask the town’s legislative to approve the Center’s “change of use essentially.” 

COA member Maryann Scali

After a month of meetings in April, the COA on Wednesday, April 30, voted 9-1 to delay the proposed transition of the Rec Department employees in the Center until the completion of the ongoing University of Massachusetts Boston community needs assessment survey of town’s seniors, and the formation of a working advisory group made up of COA members, residents, and others would then meet to hammer out a new plan. 

“We don’t have enough detail [about the transition plan],” said COA member Andrea Paschal just before Wednesday’s vote. “The thought of having the Rec Department, library, and senior services here all the way through ’til November seems almost impossible to me. So I think if I had to decide today … let’s wait at least until the fall when the library has moved out and when we have more information about the details and then come to a decision about the best way to combine rec, veterans, and senior services.” 

Yet, according to two COA members, the vote—and the hopes of senior activists—was insubstantial at Wednesday’s meeting, as the final determination on the transition lies in the hands of the town’s administrative body.

“We do have our hands tied, because ultimately, we advise the Select Board, [but] the Select Board is the body which ultimately makes these decisions,” said COA Chair Karen Donelan.

At the COA public meetings, opinions sharpened as the assembled voiced its approval of speakers who blasted the proposed transfer and vowed to halt the move. Supporters contend that inserting the Rec. Department employees violates the long-standing agreement between the town and financial donors who brought in approximately $1 million that the primary use of the building would be senior-oriented. 

For COA member Maryann Scali, the sole purpose of the Center—approved in 2005 by a Town Meeting vote—is as a “senior center, and this is why it’s here and why millions of dollars was donated.” “Now the recreation department has moved in without our consent, without discussion,” she said at an earlier meeting.

Others believe the COA has only a single course to take.

“A resounding NO!”

“There’s nothing in your charge that allows you to have the Recreation Commission come in and do anything else. Your main function is to serve the elderly people in this town. So the answer to the town: ‘Can we bring the Recreation Department?’ should be a resounding NO!” said Mark D’Andrea.

Yet the town and the Select Board stand firm in their belief that there is reasonable cause to move forward with the transisition. While wanting to be very respectful of the COA, Select Board Chair Elizabeth Dionne said at its Monday, April 28 meeting that the board has long committed to continuing to have the Beech Street Center dedicated to seniors “from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.” For that reason, Dionne opposes the suggestion of bringing in a small number of town employees, which constitutes a full-fledged abandonment of the Center’s main role. 

“I really object to this claim that it’s a change of use. I don’t want that claim to go out there unanswered. To say there’s a change of use, in my mind, is to perpetuate a falsehood,” said Dionne. Town Administrator Patrice Garvin noted a recent reading of the 2011 Memorandum of Understanding by the town’s legal counsel refutes the change of use claims and renders the advocate’s challenge moot.

The board has pointed to practical reasons for the transistion. Select Board Vice Chair Matt Taylor said the move is coming at an opportune time as “there is a renewed energy and enthusiasm around our Senior Center” and the extra pair of hands and ability to extend the building’s hours that “there are real opportunities to serve our residents.”

“Bringing staff to the administrative offices would allow both staffs to share responsibilities while freeing up staff from the desk to help programming and services throughout the building, especially at later hours that seniors have been requesting,” said Taylor.

Community Services Director Brendan Fitts said the move would enhance efficiency while supporting cross-departmental collaboration. The COA and Rec. Department use the same software and share the same administrative backbone within the Community Service.

“[It] aligns with town goals,” said Fitts, as it is doing more with less with long-term savings, all the while maintaining the senior Center’s focus on serving the town’s elder community.

However, the chief cudgel the town holds over the COA vote are two past acts: stripping the independence of the Center and the COA, and Town Meeting passing changes to the Town Administrator’s position. After several seniors at the last public meeting suggested a much stronger response than a slowdown of the process – one going so far as suggesting the council resign en masse for failing its mission to promote elder services – COA member Joel Semuels told those attending that the COA is restrained by past presence from halting the move.

Samuels explained that the COA vote was only on whether to proceed with the construction project—including creating the new entrance and interior modifications—and on getting the Veterans and Recreation Department staff into this building. “That’s what this meeting is about,” he said. 

“The Recreation Department and the Veterans [Agent] and the COA are part of a Community Services Department. That is a reality right now. That horse has left the bar. The fact that the COA is not a free-standing Senior Center has already been decided. Last year, we fought that and lost, so we’re not returning.”

COA Chair Karen Donelan

“Town meeting by its vote a number of years ago, gave the town administrator the authority to oversee the staff of the Council on Aging,” added Our board can advocate. Our board can plead. Our board can suggest our board does not hire and fire staff. That is in the town administrator’s authority by vote of Town Meeting,” said Donelan.

“What we are saying [with the vote] is we want to delay until we can answer many of the questions that have been raised,” said said. “We don’t want to move ahead with what a legitimate policy process is. We’re doing our best to hear your questions and say, ‘Let’s answer them before we take a vote’.”

Belmont Town Election: Yates Takes Select Board Race, Crowley Squeaks In As Moderator, Donner Elected To Library Trustees

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Tyler Yates arrives at Town Hall to hear he was elected to the Belmont Select Board

With more than three of four Belmont voters deciding to take a pass, there was a good chance a few surprises were in store from the 2025 annual Town Election held April 1, April Fool’s Day.

Despite contested races in four town-wide offices, voter participation was just 23.6 percent—the lowest numbers since 2018, when a minuscule 16.5 percent came out to cast ballots, which made the landscape ripe for challengers. In the town-wide races, a long-serving elected official was edged out by just 10 votes by a rival who lost his bid last year by a wide margin. At the same time, a venerable incumbent was outed by a candidate who was unceremoniously dumped from her seat on another committee just five years ago.

Results of the 2025 Belmont Town Elections can be found here

In the race for Select Board, Planning Board Chair Taylor Yates topped each of Belmont’s eight precincts to capture the seat vacated by Roy Epstein, defeating another first-time candidate, Economic Development Committee Chair Paul Joy, 2,533 to 1,738. Several observers noted the similarities of the pair – both relatively recent residents with young children (Yates welcoming a newborn last year) who ran on their accomplishments and new vision – and how this race represents a generational “changing of the guard” in town leadership.

“I feel extraordinary gratitude to all the voters, to my campaign team, the volunteers, the donors, and my family. A lot of people came together to make tonight happen,” said Yates, who witnessed his victory in the packed second-floor lobby of Town Hall. Candidates, observers, four or five children, and a crew from Belmont Media Center came to hear the traditional reading of results just after 9 p.m.

Yates said his positive vision of Belmont’s future brought out voters. “Our best days are ahead of us if we have leaders willing to push forward on our biggest priorities,” he said.

In a bit of an upsetting of the political apple cart, former School Committee member Micheal Crowley in his second go around for the post, squeaked by four-term Select Board member Mark Paolillo by the razor thin of margins, a mere 10 votes, 2,133 to 2,123. While both candidates ran on making changes to the office held for nearly two decades by Mike Widmer, Crowley said he believed voters saw him as the greater reformer.

“I have a great deal of work ahead of me [because] I promised a lot of change,” said Crowley, specifically on the focus of the job, “that the moderator will be much more engaged with the community.” One concrete example will be establishing a citizens’ advisory board and a commitment to virtual Town Meetings.

It was a good night for former School Committee members as Tara Donner placed second in a tight three-way race for two seats on the Board of Library Trustees, defeating long-time member Mike McCarthy, who placed third. Donner lost her school committee seat in the 2021 post-pandemic lockdown election, in which voters locally and nationally placed their frustrations onto incumbents. However, the public school educator and Town Meeting member since 2007 wanted to be involved in town government. With her background teaching English, “libraries have always been a place I love, where I’ve taken my kids and where I have been a heavy user.”

As with the Select Board race, Donner believed “people are just interested in what the next generation of Belmont leaders might bring to the library.” She said that once the new library building opens in early 2026, “we also need to have the programming and have the resources to fill it with the services that people are looking for in Belmont.” Joining Donnor on the committee will be Edward Barker, the candidate who topped the field, in which 142 votes separated the three candidates.

Talking about the school committee, that group now has two new members with newcomers Zehra Abid-Wood, who scored an impressive 45 percent of the total ballots cast with 3,213 votes, and Brian Palmer, each winning a three-year term.

The final competitive race saw Julie LeMay easily securing a fourth term on the Board of Health, defeating first-time candidate Michael Todd Thompson. Thompson also ran for a seat on the School Committee.

The big surprise on the Town Meeting ledger was the number of seats that write-ins will fill: In Precinct 3, Wendy Etkind, Ashley Addington, and Constantin Lichi won three-year terms via write-in votes, while Andrea Carrillo-Rhodes and Franceny Johnson will be attending Town Meeting as write-ins. And in Precinct 7, Mary Rock got 26 of her friends and neighbors to write in her name to secure the 12th spot on the ballot.

Among Town Meeting incumbents, Marie Warner placed 13th in Precinct 6 despite garnering 388 votes, which would have comfortably secured a seat in the seven other precincts.

Write-in Sally Martin took the one-year seat in Precinct 1, while over at Precinct 7, James Reynolds will need to choose whether to select a three-year or a two-year term, as he secured that final spot for a three-year seat and topped the field for a two-year term.

No Summer Al Fresco Dining In Belmont Center As Eateries Not Interested In Outdoor Service

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Outdoor dining in Belmont Center 2021

The days of al fresco dining in Belmont Center – a staple of local restaurants since 2020 – has all but ended as Leonard Street eateries are not interested continuing to provide open air service this summer, according to the leader of Belmont’s largest business organization.

“There’s not going to be any outdoor dining for this upcoming season,” said Deran Muckjian, president of the Belmont Center Business Association, who has been in discussion with the three restaurants – il Casale, the Wellington, and Stoneheart Pizza – which led the push for street-side service in the past few years.

Speaking before the Select Board on March 24, Muckjian said the reason for the pull back was simply a financial decision: The revenue being generated from the added outdoor tables didn’t justify the expense the businesses put into it.

“I hope the residents are not disappointed, but it was really an economic thing,” said Muckjian. “You can’t blame the restaurants’ thinking. They have a lot of space indoor that’s not being utilized, so they figure they can bring [customers] back inside.”

The Select Board at its Monday, March 24 meeting, were scheduled to go over this year’s sidewalk dining policy which was established during the early days of the COVID pandemic. With indoor dining under wide-ranging of state restrictions including masking and mandated space requirements, the town sought to assist local restaurants by increasing outside spaces to be used for al fresco dining. The plan expanded table service into Leonard Street behind jersey barriers, allowing the businesses an opportunity to salvage sales and keep the “door” open.

The initial plan included blocking off Leonard Street from Alexander Avenue to Concord Avenue before being modified to include a single lane running down the middle of the road with barriers down the length of the street, restricting street parking which angered many non-eatery retailers.

Over the past few years, the once popular eating option has seen a decreasing interest from restaurants asking for the extra space as COVID restrictions ended and

Muckjian said there will be limited fresh-air options including il Casale utilizing its patio in front of the restaurant, and “maybe” adding a couple tables on its sidewalk.

“It’s wide enough there and they’ve had it before. That’s their extent of outdoor dining,” he said. Muckjian suggested the select board establish rules on sidewalk-only dining and agreed with the board that the cost of a permit on future al fresco dining be upped from $250 to $500, putting the town in line with nearby communities such as Winchester.

Paul Joy: My Vision For Belmont

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Paul Joy has a vision for Belmont

Belmont, I’m Paul Joy, and I’m running for Select Board because this isn’t just about me. It’s about us. On Tuesday, April 1, we get to decide what our town becomes. 

I live on Harvard Road with my wife and three kids—Thomas, Lucas, and Alexandra—who attend Chenery and Wellington every school day. My wife, Yuan, is an immigrant and also teaches at the Belmont Co-Op Nursery School. We’re raising our family here, facing the same rising costs—taxes, rent, small business pressures—that is felt across our community all feel. I’ve heard your stories on porches, at games, in shops, over the phone, and they’ve shaped me. Together, we can build a Belmont that thrives for all of us.

What have I done for us? 

  • As Chair of the Economic Development Committee, I’ve fought to fill empty storefronts, bringing jobs and boosting our tax base to ease our burdens: supporting our schools and services. But it’s more than that. 
  • I chaired the Co-Op Nursery School Board, raising funds to keep tuition affordable and give our teachers bonuses, because early education sets our kids up for life. 
  • I’ve coached our kids on Belmont’s soccer fields, and helped organize practices and clinics at the same time. 
  • On the education side, I can’t tell you how proud I am of the work-based learning virtual internship program that Belmont High School students have available to them.  

My family’s roots trace back to Thomas Joy, who built Boston’s first Town House, a place that literally helped shape American democracy. And as an immigrant family today, we bring that legacy forward, proving Belmont is stronger when we embrace our diversity.

What sets me apart? 

  • I don’t just nod along—I ask hard questions and stand firm for what we need. 
  • When others accept “that’s how it’s always been,” I push for better, not quick, fixes, but durable solutions.
  • I’ve seen us struggle with a cost of living crisis, seeing seniors stretched thin, small businesses balancing rent and red tape, and renters and families priced out. I’ve demanded we rethink how we grow and that includes applying every year for every competitive grant opportunity that we can.  
  • I’ve called for a town voice to unite our business owners, amplifying their ideas to keep our downtown vibrant, not drowned out by endless construction or big chains. We need growth that works for us, not against us – in places like Brighton Street and Cushing Square, and South Pleasant St not just Belmont Center – where we can sustain it without losing our charm.


We’ve got a vision worth fighting for: a Belmont where our commercial tax base grows so our wallets don’t shrink, where our kids learn in strong schools, and our seniors stay in homes they’ve built. I’ve got the experience, as a teacher, consultant, and coach, to make it real, tackling problems with data, grit, and heart. I’ve always sought zoning changes with our entire community in mind, cut red tape like parking, and listened to you. We can partner with our shop owners, not steamroll them, and plan finances that last, not just patch holes.

Some say we should settle, that change is too messy. I say we’re tougher than that. We’re the town that shovels each other’s driveways, cheers our kids on, and keeps our shops alive. We don’t back down, we rise. My ancestor Thomas Joy didn’t just build a building; he built a place for us to stand up and demand more. I’m here to do the same, not for me, but for us. On April 1, we choose: a Belmont that builds, grows, and thrives together.

So, Belmont, let’s do this. Grab your neighbor, your friend, your family—head to the polls on April 1, and Vote Joy. Check out joyforbelmont.com to see our plans—because this is our campaign. We’re not just voting for a person; we’re voting for us: a town where we all belong, prosper, and shine.

Let’s make it happen, together. Thank you.

‘Won’t You Stay?’ Garvin Receives Hefty Pay Increase To Remain In Belmont

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Patrice Garvin, Belmont Town Administrator

Maurice Williams and the Zodiacs (and, yes, Jackson Browne for all you Boomers) asked the question: “Oh, won’t you stay/Just a little bit longer?” You can now add the trio known as the Belmont Select Board with their own version of the classic doo-wop song. Will you stay Patrice?

A day after it was revealed that Town Administrator Patrice Garvin was a finalist for a similar position in Danvers, the Select Board approved a significant pay increase to convince Garvin to continue her tenure in Belmont for the next five years.

Using a hastily added item snuck into the board’s Wednesday meeting agenda – inserted just within the two-day notification requirement for public meetings – the board voted unanimously to increase Garvin’s salary from $216,800 (OK’d in September) to $229,500 per annum as of Jan. 15.

The salary includes a compensation package in which Garvin will receive a 2 percent annual pay increase over her contract and a $5,000 retention bonus paid out at the beginning of the fiscal year.

Garvin’s new pay package came about as the town administrator’s future in the “Town of Homes” was suddenly viewed as tenative as she perpared for her interview in Danvers.

“This was not welcome news,” said Board Chair Elizabeth Dionne of Garvin’s possible departure, noting the town is facing many “mission critical” issues such as major zoning bylaw reform and a possible 2007 budget override. With the pool of qualified town administrators “vanishingly small” and with the knowledge it would likely take anyone hired at least two years to get up to speed, “I asked Ms Garvin a key question, would she consider an improved employment contract from Belmont?” said Dionne. While surprised by the offer, Garvin “agreed to talk.”

With time of the essence, the board acted quickly to keep the town administrator that one board member recently described as “spectacular.” First, it revised the board’s meeting agenda before Monday’s Special Town Meeting (whose members approved the town’s new Accessory Dwelling Unit bylaw) to add an executive session that was later reveiled to knock out the details of Garvin’s new salary contract.

The board had scheduled a Wednesday meeting to prepare for a second night of Town Meeting if it had run long on Monday. Usually, this “extra” board meeting is cancelled. But late Monday, the board hastily added to the board’s Wednesday meeting agenda an item on the “Discussion and Possible Vote to Ratify Amendment to Contract for Town Administrator (Item Added)” just within the two-day notification requirement for public meetings. At Wednesday’s meeting that lasted 13 minutes and no public discussion, the board reupped Garvin contract for five additional years.

Some citizens – while expressing support to retain Garvin’s services, where less than thrilled by the board’s transparency. “It was like they wanted to keep this quiet,” said one resident who viewed the meeting on her smart phone while attending the Belmont vs. Hingham Girls Hockey state quarter-finals in Stoneham.

For other residents, the cost of keeping Garvin is an issue. According to World at Work, a global advisory company, the 5.9 percent jump in her annual paycheck is a step up from the average pay increase of 3.6 to 4 percent in the US last year. At her new salary, Garvin earns more than Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healy, who takes home about $222,000.

However, according to Dionne, the board’s action is to bring Garvin’s pay and compensation package to a comparable level to her peers, an issue Dionne said was not fully addressed in September when the board supported a merit increase for Garvin.

“Her current compensation package is not competitive,” Dionne said. “We have looked at all-in compensation comparisons for other town managers and administrators, and Garvin is near the bottom of the list despite having significant experience.” The Select Board knew this when we conducted her annual review last fall.”

While noting the subject of Garvin’s salary has been a topic of “enduring interest” to many Belmont residents, Board member Roy Epstein said her salary is based on the town’s assessment of the market, with a reasonable set of benchmarks for town administrator, police chief and fire chief, and the salary is completely in line with those competitive benchmarks.

“Retaining [Garvin] is something of great importance. I don’t think we have any reasonable alternative but to pay a market based salary. It’s not at the top of the scale, but it’s certainly not at the bottom. It’s in the middle, and that’s where I think we ought to be,” he said.

A comparison to eastern Massachusetts municipalities of similar size to Belmont shows that Garvin will just above the mid-line of the salary conversation:

  • Arlington’s Sanford Pooler received $188,583 in 2022; 
  • Lexington’s James Malloy took home $238,142 in 2023;
  • Winchester’s Beth Rudolph made $215,995 when she was hired in 2023.
  • Concord’s Kerry Lafleur received $246,671 in 2023.
  • Burlington’s Paul Sagarino Jr. received $243,834 in 2023.
  • Needham’s Kate Fitzpatrick made $234,008 before performance reviews in 2024.

For Garvin, returning to her office on the second floor of Town Hall is gratifying as it provides her the opportunity to continue the work she and her team have begun.

“You could start to see how all the work was starting to kind of intertwine with each other, and all the small decisions that we made years ago really coming to fruition now, and how it impacts other departments,” she said.

“So it’s really exciting to see all those things come together, and I appreciate the board’s willingness and opportunity to be in town to really to just keep going and then continue to build off of everything that we’ve done, and be able to do that with the team that’s in place,” Garvin said.