Not Again! Town Day Rained Out: Postponed ’til Sunday, Sept. 14; Garden Club Flower Sale Still On

By Leave a Comment

Photo: It’s a three-peat of rainouts for Belmont Town Day

For the third consecutive year, a forecast of noon-time spring showers has caused the postponement of the annual Belmont Town Day that was to take place on Saturday, May 17, in Belmont Center along Leonard Street.

Hosted by the Belmont Center Business Association and sponsored by Watertown Savings Bank, the event has been moved to Sunday, Sept. 14.

The annual Belmont Garden Club Flower and Plant Sale remains a “go” on Saturday, from 9 a.m. to noon outside the Belmont Lions Club at the WWI memorial on Common Street and Royal Road.

Glenn Clancy, Belmont’s Long-Serving Town Engineer, Has Died [Update]

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Glenn Clancy

Glenn Clancy, who spent nearly five decades serving the residents of Belmont, died on Wednesday, May 14, 2025.

On leave since late last year, the Quincy-native would have celebrated his 40th anniversary working in Belmont this June.

“Glenn was a dedicated public servant, whose career in Belmont spanned four decades and many roles, including long-time Director of the Office of Community Development and Town Engineer,” wrote Select Board Chair Elizabeth Dionne in an email to Town Meeting members.

“Glenn was a consummate professional. His work was meticulous and always reliable. He was a true gentleman, treating everyone—from town leaders to his professional colleagues to the most obstreperous members of the public—with unfailing courtesy and respect, not to mention a ready smile and flashes of wry humor. His passing leaves a tremendous hole in all our hearts,” Dionne noted.

Clancy’s presence was missed at this year’s Town Meeting, as he was a familiar presenter of town-sponsored articles. With a wry smile and “Ah shucks” demeanor, Clancy would expertly maneuver some of the most contentious issues before the meeting with a thorough understanding of the subject and facts.

For decades as Town Engineer, Clancy was the town official who managed the town’s notorious roads and sidewalks. But he took the job understanding resident’s complaints, but also seeing it as an opportunity to “gently” educate citizens on why their streets were on a waiting list for repair. One year at a community get-together, Clancy sat a table with a handwritten sign proclaiming: “Ask me about the roads,” and answered a night’s worth of queries.

The Flag of the United States of America at Town Hall was lowered to half-staff on Wednesday to honor Clancy. On what is expected to be the fourth night of the annual Town Meeting, Monday, May 19, Town Moderator Michael Crowley will lead the Meeting in a moment of silence to remember Clancy and mark his passing. 

According to Dionne, working in conjunction with his family, Town leadership hopes to recognize Glenn more formally at Special Town Meeting in October.

With No Rain In The Forecast, Belmont’s Town Day And Garden Club Sale Set For Saturday, May 17

By Leave a Comment

Photo: This Saturday, May 17. Belmont Center. It’s Belmont’s Town Day

After May showers caused it to be pushed back to September for the past two years, the weather forecast for the weekend is looking good for the 36th annual Belmont Town Day, hosted by the Belmont Center Business Association and sponsored by Watertown Savings Bank.

Town Day will take place on Saturday, May 17 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. along Leonard Street in the heart of Belmont Center.

The Belmont Lions Club will get things underway with a pancake breakfast at its clubhouse, 2 Common St., from 9 a.m. to 11 p.m.

There will be multiple tables and tents with local groups, non-profits, retailers and restaurants, along with kiddie rides, basketball hoops, and a always popular dunk tank which the proceeds go to Belmont Helps. There will be mini-race car driving, robots, and drone flying for kids.

On Saturday, the Belmont Garden Club is holding its annual Perennial Sale from 9 a.m. to noon, and they’ll be doing it rain or shine at the Lions Club, 1 Common St., across from the WWI memorial and the commuter rail station. Elsa from “Frozen” (10 a.m. to noon) and Spiderman (noon to 2 p.m.) will be at the Watertown Savings Bank tent. Musicial groups will play all day at the main stage.

Also on Saturday, the Belmont Garden Club is holding its annual Perennial Sale from 9 a.m. to noon, rain or shine. There will be an assortment of sun and shade perennials, including dozens of native plant species, all dug from Garden Club members’ gardens. Cash or Visa/MC/debit card for purchases over $25. The proceeds fund the Club’s community plantings, scholarships, and other activities.

First Week ’25 Town Meeting: New Moderator Passes Day One Test; No ‘Nos’ On Second Day

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Town Moderator Mike Crowley leads 2025 Town Meeting on first night of annual gathering

It’s a notice that no one had on their Town Meeting BINGO© card.

“We’re having technical difficulties. Town Meeting will resume shortly.” 

That menacing message flashed on the big screen at the Belmont High School auditorium minutes after the start of the 2025 annual Town Meeting on Monday, May 5. Zoom dropped off, the sound system shut down to be replaced by an echo as electronic and internet gremlins played havoc with the town’s ambitious attempt at a hybrid meeting.

It was an inauspicious beginning for the first night of the annual gathering and for Mike Crowley‘s start as the Town’s Moderator. But Belmont Media’s Jeff Hansel and the town’s IT crowd chased the electronic elves off, and Crowley was finally able to have a successful—with a few hiccups, but nothing to remember—first night in charge of the Belmont Town Meeting.

“[The delay] was a good thing for me,” said Crowley on Wednesday. “I was able to relax at the podium for those extra minutes, and it helped,” he said. He added that he appreciated having the Town Clerk’s staff and a slew of experienced town employees and elected officials to help guide the way.

Before the night’s business got underway, the Select Board presented a proclamation to the former moderator, Mike Widmer, for his 40 years of “extraordinary” public service including 17 years as moderator, a town meeting member and his contributions to state – a quarter century leading the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation – and local finance. Widmer told the meeting that while he was proud of what he accomplished, “but nothing good in life really gets done alone,” acknowledging the cooperation of town employees and committee members.

“I love democracy,” he said, returning to a favorite theme as moderator. Noting that 288 residents ran for Town Meeting, and come out to the annual gathering “is a marvelous thing for this town and this country that were built on this democratic experiment. So don’t take it lightly the fact that some of this become routine. And don’t take lightly the privilege of stepping to the microphone and being able to say what you feel without the fear of recrimination,” said Widmer, to a standing ovation.

State of the Town: alot good, some not so

Elizabeth Dionne, Select Board chair, gave an unofficial ‘State of the Town’ address, with the familiar phrase as title: “The Best of Times, The Worst of Times.” On the best side of the ledger, “honest, competent local government” that allowed the town and schools to work collaboratively to produce a balanced budget that, for the first time, saw agreed-on spending limits. On the worst side, clouds loom over the fiscal year 2027 budget process, which will be a “more difficult” exercise. 

Dionne highlighted Belmont’s commitment to meeting the recommendations of the 2022 Collins Center report, which pointed out the town’s financial challenges: hiring Jennifer Hewitt to the town’s newly created Financial Director’s post, an appointed treasurer, and a board of assessors, and starting a multi-year Budget Advisory Committee. 

Dionne also praised the ramping up of the Information Technology Department under Chief Innovation Officer Chris McClure, a refocus on Planning and Economic Development to attract commercial and industrial activity, and the reorganization of the Community Services Department.

But while town continues to do more with less, “we have hit the outer limits of efficiencies on the municipal side,” as Belmont ratepayers are weighed down by “one of the state’s heaviest property tax burdens,” she said.

“Persuading voters to add to their already heavy tax burden will be an uphill battle, which means that we must demonstrate ongoing fiscal discipline before asking voters for another override,” said Dionne.

First Night: 800 Apples heading to the schools

Monday’s first night of Town Meeting saw Crowley complete more than half of the 20 articles in the warrant, many profunctory, such as elected officials’ salaries. Tomi Olsen (Precinct 6) did suggest Town Clerk Ellen Cushman receive a raise citing the office’s workload and professionalism.

Town Meeting approved two new revolving funds: for the new skating rink and solid waste management. Select Board Vice Chair Matt Taylor explained that the funds raised through fees would endure, and the money is used for specific activities; solid waste management would include mattress removal. Vince Stanton (Precinct 2) asked if the money in a revolving fund could be invested in, for example, money market securities to reap the benefit of increasing rates. Taylor responded, saying those funds work by taking in revenue and distributing it when needed over the year. Also, there are lots of governmental restrictions when investing town funds. (222-18-2)

The meeting approved the School Committee’s four-year lease-to-own financing contract with Apple for 800 iPads for Belmont’s youngest students, replacing the current inventory that is coming to the end of its useful life. The contract came before Town Meeting as it had exceeded the state’s three-year limit for such agreements. The members responded positively – actual cheers – when it was revealed that the funds came from the school’s budget rather than another source, such as free cash. (231-3-0)

Finally, Town Meeting approved an article asking the state legislature to pass home rule legislation that will allow the town to ban second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides, better known as rat poison. Rodents partake of the toxic bait but, unfortunately, pass it on to the rat’s predators—like hawks, owls, and eagles—which kill them. The article passed 222-5-2.

Night Two: Roads? Yes, yes, yes, etc, etc

In a report to the Town Meeting, Library Building Committee Kathy Keohane told members that while the $39.5 million new library project is on budget with enough contingency funds to offset any foreseeable cost hikes, the project’s timeline for substantial completion has been pushed back a week to November 1. 

“That puts us moving into the building in November and December, with the hope that we’ll have some targeted services open in the library in December with a brand new opening in January,” said Keohane. “We don’t want to compete with the holidays, so we’re going to wait for the quiet month of January and celebrate the heck out of that month.”

The articles 

If you saw the final tallies on Wednesday night’s articles, you’d probably think you saw the results of some authoritarian dictatorship. For seven of the eight times it voted on either an article or appropriations, not a single Town Meeting Member cast a ‘no’ vote. In fact, one member voted against allowing Assistant Town Clerk Meg Piccioneto to substitute for Town Clerk Ellen Cushman, who couldn’t attend Wednesday. Go figure.

Want a surefire way to start a conversation in Belmont? Bring up roads and sidewalks. That’s what happened on Wednesday night as a line of members formed before the two microphones on the auditorium floor and on Zoom when the total appropriation of $2.513 million—$2 million for streets and $512,266 for sidewalks—was brought before the meeting. While the article was to appropriate funds, many members took the opportunity to express, once again, their frustrations with Belmont’s infamous roadways and sidewalks. 

After being told by National Grid that two small gas leaks on her street had to be repaired before 2027 but the town scheduled road repairs in fiscal ’24, Corinne McCue Olmsted (Precinct 1) wondered if there was any coordination with the gas utility and the town so streets would not be dug up after the repair, Assistant Town Engineer Wayne Chouinard said while there is communication between the parties, sometimes the utility will miss a scheduled monthly meeting or something will fall through the cracks to create issues with ripping up the road. 

“National Grid is the bane of my existence,” said DPW Director Jay Marcotte. While the town has a five-year moratorium on any work after a repair, it does not apply to the utility. “We can work with them with the best intentions to figure out how they can get in and do their gas work to repair leaks, they may not get around to it. It’s extremely frustrating on our end.”

Rosemary Burke (Precinct 2) told the meeting that $2.5 million is “nowhere near what this town needs to spend on roads and sidewalks.” She contends that “all the roads are a mess … and there isn’t anyone that lives anywhere here that doesn’t have a terrible street.” 

“What kind of plan will the town come up with … to more substantially address the town’s serious infrastructure problem?” Burke asked. Marcotte said his department works with consultants who rate the town’s roadways and prioritize those streets that fall below a set standard, basically selecting the worst of the lot. 

Here’s a first for the Town Meeting: Emily Peterson called the question via Zoom. The appropriation passed 218-1-1

The answer: 157. Question: How many trees did the DPW plant in the past fiscal year? And that was nearly twice the average (80) of replacement trees placed throughout town, mainly on the green strips next to sidewalks, according to Marcotte. Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Capital Budget Committee’s request of $35,000 for tree planting in FY ’25.

Article 3: Updating the 2004 Belmont Floodplan District zoning bylaw by modifying existing sections to meet new federal requirements and incorporating new definitions and use regulations. (233-0-0)

Article 12: Approve $3.1 million in funding for the water main replacement program. Now four decades on, the program has replaced 35.5 miles of the 39 miles of unlined steel water mains laid before 1929. Best part, a loan from the MWRA to do the work is interest free. (242-0-0).

Article 18: The quarter-century-old roof of the Chenery Upper Elementary School needs to be replaced. The first part of the three-year plan is installing new HVAC systems for $3.7 million. Possible rebates, grants for updated heating and cooling equipment, and any remaining funds from this year’s work will go towards the $4.2 million to replace the roof in fiscal ’27. (207-0-1)

Article 17: Capital Expenditures, totaling $668,000, included:

  • Council on Aging: An accessible van at $75,000. (216-0-0)
  • DPW: Tree planting and purchasing a dump truck for $135,000. (239-0-1)
  • Fire Department: $118,000 towards a $545,000 new ambulance, $90,000 for breathing apparatus (239-0-1)
  • $250,000 in Information Technology infrastructure upgrades and cables (213-0-0) 

Town Meet will reconvene at 7 p.m., Monday, May 12 at the Belmont High School auditorium.

Performing Arts Company Present Student Directed One Act Plays, May 8-10

By Leave a Comment

Photo: One Acts will take place in the Belmont High School Black Box Theater

Join the Belmont High Schoool Performing Arts Company for its annual Student Directed Festival of One Act plays. Featuring eight short works directed by PAC Juniors and Seniors, One Acts are a mix of comedy, drama and everything in between.

Performances: THURSDAY, FRIDAY, SATURDAY at 7 p.m.

MAY 8-10 in the Belmont High School Black Box Theater

TICKET INFO:
ADULTS $10 / STUDENTS $5

TICKETS CAN BE PURCHASED BELOW

https://belmontpac.booktix.com/dept/BHSPAC/e/1ACTS25

COA Votes To Delay Transitioning Rec Dept Staff To Beech Street Center; Town, Select Board Has Other Ideas

By Leave a Comment

Photo: The Council on Aging voted 9-1 to delay the transition of three Recreation Department staffers and the Veterans Agent into the Beech Street Center

At first glance, the proposal from town officials to transistion the Recreation Department to the Beech Street Senior Center this fall appears straightforward enough. Due to space needs at Town Hall with the Retirement Board heading to the Homer Building, construction work – including adding a new entry specifically for Recreation Department use – will be performed so three Recreation Department administrative staffers and the town’s Veterans Agent can relocate into a corner of the Beech Street Center as town librarians – in the location temporarily as the new library is being built – are prepared to transfer out. 

While the request didn’t appear to be contentious, don’t tell that to seniors who contend the transition is part of a “power play” by the town to reduce or remove the Council on Aging’s control of the Beech Street Center. Many senior advocates point to last year’s placement of the once-independent Senior Center into the newly-created Community Services Department – which occurred only after a protracted debate – as another example of the town interjecting its will onto its seniors.

“A lot of us see this building as just being prime real estate, and the town is licking its chops and figuring out every scheme it can use to move inside,” said Bob McGaw. The chair of the By-Law Review Committee has spearheaded a successful Citizens Petition with more than 300 signatures to bring an article to the Special Town Meeting inside the annual Town Meeting on May 21 to ask the town’s legislative to approve the Center’s “change of use essentially.” 

COA member Maryann Scali

After a month of meetings in April, the COA on Wednesday, April 30, voted 9-1 to delay the proposed transition of the Rec Department employees in the Center until the completion of the ongoing University of Massachusetts Boston community needs assessment survey of town’s seniors, and the formation of a working advisory group made up of COA members, residents, and others would then meet to hammer out a new plan. 

“We don’t have enough detail [about the transition plan],” said COA member Andrea Paschal just before Wednesday’s vote. “The thought of having the Rec Department, library, and senior services here all the way through ’til November seems almost impossible to me. So I think if I had to decide today … let’s wait at least until the fall when the library has moved out and when we have more information about the details and then come to a decision about the best way to combine rec, veterans, and senior services.” 

Yet, according to two COA members, the vote—and the hopes of senior activists—was insubstantial at Wednesday’s meeting, as the final determination on the transition lies in the hands of the town’s administrative body.

“We do have our hands tied, because ultimately, we advise the Select Board, [but] the Select Board is the body which ultimately makes these decisions,” said COA Chair Karen Donelan.

At the COA public meetings, opinions sharpened as the assembled voiced its approval of speakers who blasted the proposed transfer and vowed to halt the move. Supporters contend that inserting the Rec. Department employees violates the long-standing agreement between the town and financial donors who brought in approximately $1 million that the primary use of the building would be senior-oriented. 

For COA member Maryann Scali, the sole purpose of the Center—approved in 2005 by a Town Meeting vote—is as a “senior center, and this is why it’s here and why millions of dollars was donated.” “Now the recreation department has moved in without our consent, without discussion,” she said at an earlier meeting.

Others believe the COA has only a single course to take.

“A resounding NO!”

“There’s nothing in your charge that allows you to have the Recreation Commission come in and do anything else. Your main function is to serve the elderly people in this town. So the answer to the town: ‘Can we bring the Recreation Department?’ should be a resounding NO!” said Mark D’Andrea.

Yet the town and the Select Board stand firm in their belief that there is reasonable cause to move forward with the transisition. While wanting to be very respectful of the COA, Select Board Chair Elizabeth Dionne said at its Monday, April 28 meeting that the board has long committed to continuing to have the Beech Street Center dedicated to seniors “from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.” For that reason, Dionne opposes the suggestion of bringing in a small number of town employees, which constitutes a full-fledged abandonment of the Center’s main role. 

“I really object to this claim that it’s a change of use. I don’t want that claim to go out there unanswered. To say there’s a change of use, in my mind, is to perpetuate a falsehood,” said Dionne. Town Administrator Patrice Garvin noted a recent reading of the 2011 Memorandum of Understanding by the town’s legal counsel refutes the change of use claims and renders the advocate’s challenge moot.

The board has pointed to practical reasons for the transistion. Select Board Vice Chair Matt Taylor said the move is coming at an opportune time as “there is a renewed energy and enthusiasm around our Senior Center” and the extra pair of hands and ability to extend the building’s hours that “there are real opportunities to serve our residents.”

“Bringing staff to the administrative offices would allow both staffs to share responsibilities while freeing up staff from the desk to help programming and services throughout the building, especially at later hours that seniors have been requesting,” said Taylor.

Community Services Director Brendan Fitts said the move would enhance efficiency while supporting cross-departmental collaboration. The COA and Rec. Department use the same software and share the same administrative backbone within the Community Service.

“[It] aligns with town goals,” said Fitts, as it is doing more with less with long-term savings, all the while maintaining the senior Center’s focus on serving the town’s elder community.

However, the chief cudgel the town holds over the COA vote are two past acts: stripping the independence of the Center and the COA, and Town Meeting passing changes to the Town Administrator’s position. After several seniors at the last public meeting suggested a much stronger response than a slowdown of the process – one going so far as suggesting the council resign en masse for failing its mission to promote elder services – COA member Joel Semuels told those attending that the COA is restrained by past presence from halting the move.

Samuels explained that the COA vote was only on whether to proceed with the construction project—including creating the new entrance and interior modifications—and on getting the Veterans and Recreation Department staff into this building. “That’s what this meeting is about,” he said. 

“The Recreation Department and the Veterans [Agent] and the COA are part of a Community Services Department. That is a reality right now. That horse has left the bar. The fact that the COA is not a free-standing Senior Center has already been decided. Last year, we fought that and lost, so we’re not returning.”

COA Chair Karen Donelan

“Town meeting by its vote a number of years ago, gave the town administrator the authority to oversee the staff of the Council on Aging,” added Our board can advocate. Our board can plead. Our board can suggest our board does not hire and fire staff. That is in the town administrator’s authority by vote of Town Meeting,” said Donelan.

“What we are saying [with the vote] is we want to delay until we can answer many of the questions that have been raised,” said said. “We don’t want to move ahead with what a legitimate policy process is. We’re doing our best to hear your questions and say, ‘Let’s answer them before we take a vote’.”

Habitat Annual Plant Sale Saturday … Along With Goats!

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Come kid around with the Habitat goats on Saturday

Come for the plants, stay for the goats as the Mass Audubon Habitat on Juniper Road is holding its annual extravaganza on Saturday, May 3.

The Habitat Plant Sale will take place from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. where you can buy a wide variety of vegetables, herbs, annuals, and pollinator plants for your garden.

And from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m., bring your own kids and hang out with the Habitat’s goats. Enter a raffle for prizes, enjoy goat-themed games while getting up close-and-personal with this playful herd.

Parking is limited, so it would be best to carpool or get dropped off.

Home To Belmont’s Own Arsenal Yards? Hill Estates Added To Brighton Street Overlay District

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Belmont’s Hill Estates will likely be added to the Brighton Street Corridor overlay district

While the Belmont Center Overlay Zoning plan has been officially shelved until the fall Special Town Meeting, the town is ready to start the second overlay project, targeting the Brighton Street/Hittinger Street Corridor. On Monday, a surprising new element was added to the district: Belmont’s most significant residential housing development.

“It seems like a no-brainer,” said Elizabeth Dionne, Select Board Chair, on including Hill Estates in the town’s plan to assist in creating a new commercial/retail/residential hub in Belmont. 

With nearly 400 rental units in four multi-floor apartment blocks and several single-family townhouses, the Estates provides a unique feature to the town’s and greater Boston housing stock: affordable market rents, between $1,000 and $1,500 below comparable units in nearby Cambridge and the region. 

And at Monday’s meeting, the Select Board viewed the Hill Estates as an important component of the new district. While creating the zoning overlay “needs to play itself out, I think there’s widespread support for including the Hill Estates,” said Dionne.

“I think the Hill Estates actually has a huge potential to be something really amazing,” said Board member Taylor Yates. 

“Our own Arsenal Yards,” said Dionne. “The number of times I hear people say, ‘Oh, I wish Belmont would have what Arsenal Yards has’.”

And while Belmont isn’t equipped to set aside the one-million square feet to accompany the 250,000 square feet of retail, 302 apartment units, 400,000 square feet for a life sciences campus, 146 hotel rooms, and multi-level parking Arsenal Yards encompasses, Dionne said she could envision “creating a smaller version” of Watertown’s commercial Xanadu.

“I totally agree,” said Ryan. 

But the public will need to wait a year before a finished plan comes before Town Meeting gets its hands on the proposal. In the view of the town’s planner, a completed zoning plan for the Brighton Street Corridor will be ready for the 2026 annual meeting, “if that is not too much of a disappointment,” said Ryan.

In Dionne’s view, simply beginning the process is “an important signal” to town taxpayers—who have repeatedly voted to increase the commercial real estate base—and potential developers. “There’s some skepticism that we actually are going to do something there,” she noted, and “we are serious about providing options and opportunities.”

As for the Belmont Center overlay, Taylor Yates said the plan is 75 percent complete, “[putting] us right on track” where the Planning Board had hoped to be. Yates marshaled support and drove the Belmont Center process as Planning Board chair until he was elected to the board in April.

But Yates acknowledged that the plan has a way to go convincing a good portion of residents of its viability to do what it hopes to do. Abutters, traffic observers, and even the president of the local business association have expressed their reservations, which put a kibosh in the already ambitious plans of the town and planning board to have the zoning changes come before the Town Meeting this month. Changes to the town’s zoning book require a two-thirds vote, which didn’t appear all that likely after a series of public meetings in February and March. 

More outreach needed for Belmont Center plan

“Just because the zoning is done does not mean the public outreach piece is done … and obviously the community articulated that they would like more time for public engagement,” said Yates. Ryan forwarded the Select Board a new timeline of when the consultant will have revised plans and putting together schedules for future public meetings and outreach.

The initial goal of the Brighton Street overlay is to create a zoning district to facilitate the redevelopment of the Purecoat Plating plant and the brick buildings along Hittinger Street and the MBTA commuter rail line. 

“I see no reason why the Brighton Street project can’t begin in May,” said Ryan, as it has many of the same elements used in the Belmont Center design. One possible obstacle facing the planning process is the difficulty of starting a public process during the summer when many residents are out of town. 

“So maybe we can do an initial public process in late May and maybe start up again in September or October,” said Ryan.

As the discussion was winding down, Select Board Vice Chair Matt Taylor asked a question: Will the new Brighton Street Corridor zoning district include Hill Estates?

“Yes. Absolutely,” said Dionne as Ryan seconded her response. Until Monday, the Hill Estates had not been pegged as part of the corridor rezoning. Yates noted that the town has not implemented an area plan – which identifies future land uses in an overall community-wide context – for the corridor, but “as a matter of likelihood, I would at least consider [it] for inclusion.” 

While a likely redevelopment scheme for the Purecoat North site is hardly a secret – the Tosi family which owns the site and the town held a public meeting last year on creating a 225-unit apartment complex – it is unknown how the Hill Estates would be linked to any Brighton Street proposal.

Despite what was said at the meeting, adding Belmont’s largest residential development into the overlay does not foretell the site’s future, which houses more than five percent of the town’s residents. The Hill Estate ownership and the town have not approached the other to discuss its future.

But Yates said it’s fairly rare in Belmont for a large number of acres to be owned by a single person, so it’s best for the town to be proactive in its zoning, letting interested developers know the direction the town wishes to take. 

Hill Estates Moves Closer to Sale As Well-Known Boston RE Firm Signs P&S For $175 Million

By Leave a Comment

Photo: A purchase and sales agreement has been signed for the Hill Estates

A purchase and sale agreement for the Hill Estates, Belmont’s largest residential development, has been signed by the CEO of one of Boston’s best known and largest residential firms.

According to the PSA signed on April 15, the nearly 400 apartments and a small commercial space off Brighton Street is to be purchased from the DiGiovanni family by Hill Estates NERA, LLC which has offices at 39 Brighton Ave. in Boston. Hill Estates NERA propose to buy the nealy 15-acre site for $175 million: $173 million for the residential portion and $3 million in commercial property on the site.

The PSA can be found on Justia, a website specializing in legal information retrieval. 

A signed purchase and sale agreement does not constitute a sale; it simply sets the terms for a potential sale by outlying the obligations of the buyer and seller to complete the transaction. The actual sale occurs when the property is formally transferred at the closing. 

Signing for Hill Estates NERA is Jameson Brown, co-CEO of the Hamilton Company, one of the largest privately-held real estate organizations in New England. Now in its 71st year, the firm manages and leases approximately 1.5 million square feet of commercial space and in excess of 5,600 residential units, while developing and constructing both residential and commercial projects throughout Greater Boston.

The company was founded by Harold Brown, one of the true titans of Boston real estate. In six decades, Brown amassed billions of dollars worth of Boston-area property: if you were a student living along Commonwealth Avenue since the 1960s, you likely paid rent to Brown.

Belmont FY ’26 Water, Sewer Rates Following Recommended Rate Increase Of 3 Percent

By Leave a Comment

Photo: Water and sewer rates are going up three percent

Belmont residents and businesses will see their water and sewer bills increase by a recommended three percent beginning in August.

Starting with the August 1 statement, the annual combined water and sewer bill for the average single-family household using approximately 200 cubic feet of water a month – the equivalent of 1,496 gallons – will increase from $624.99 in fiscal ’25 to $652.84 in fiscal ’26.

These are decreases from FY ’25 rate changes of four percent for water and eight percent for sewage, despite a significant jump in the bill the town received for the coming year from its water supplier. Belmont DPW Director Jay Marcotte told the board this year’s assessment from the Massachusetts Water Resource Authority – which supplies the town with water and sewage removal – came in “a little high on the water side” at 10.5 percent, from $3.26 million to $3.61 million.

The chief reason for the jump was global climate change, according to assistant Town Administrator Jennifer Hewitt, resulting in drier than normal seasons including a summer drought.

“So when a community, like Belmont, has drought, our irrigation goes up because people have nice, manicured lawns and landscaping, and they don’t want that to go to the side, so the irrigation goes up,” said Marcotte.

Marcotte also announced fee increases for serviced provided by the Water Department. Backflow device test, backflow device retest, and a failure to repair failed backflow device goes from $75 to $100, while a temporary water meter assembly will change from a $150 fee plus usage to a $800 flat fee.

Belmont is mid-way through a five year overhaul of financing the town’s Water and Sewer Enterprise funds by Raftelis, a national management consulting firm focusing on municipal government and utilities.

Related article: May 10 Public Meeting On Plan To Increase Water/Sewer Rates After No Hikes For Half A Decade

The Raftelis report issued in May, 2023, suggested Belmont’s water rates increase by four percent annually for the first two years, and recommending an eight percent increase in sewer rates in fiscal ’24 and ’25 before reverting to three percent increases in the remaining three years.

As noted by Select Board Chair Elizabeth Dionne, up until fiscal year 2023 the town used to charge a flat rate for water and sewer regardless of the size of the water main, as it would rely on reserves to subsidize residential water rates. But this strategy placed a strain on those reserves which would over time place them in deficit.

“Now we have aggressive charge, which is the standard practice [nationwide.] It also allowed us to match more closely infrastructure expenses with users,” said Dionne.

6:09
of the many things we love about Jennifer, is that we get this forecasting really, really helpful for planning purposes. Jay and

6:17
I have been a great team on this so graphic. Tell us it’s been their model was phenomenal, and we’ve been able to build on that. That was something that was part of the analysis, that the model came with it, and so we simply updated the model to be able to provide this analysis. Okay, exhausts my questions.

6:42
Matt, did you

6:44
questions, is our Is there any trend reading to be said about our water usage throughout town? Is it like trending

6:52
up? Trending historically? No, actually, it’s not down. Everything is now low flow. So our water consumption, holistically, over the last 10 years, has been going down, down down every year. That’s why our cost of water, cost of infrastructure, cost of maintenance, doesn’t go down. So that’s why our rates have to kind

7:18
of keep up with that. Okay? And then the but the MWRA assessment also seems to keep going up. Yes, it’s like

7:27
we’ve had years where we were zero.

7:28
We had Year Zero. Sewer is one of the lower that we’ve seen. On average, it’s about 3% they came in at 1.4 it was less than 2% it was one of the lower ones I’ve seen in my time here. So that, to me, is a would show a term that the water consumption is going down like for residential use. Yeah, I know

7:52
there’s a lot of incentives to have low flow toilets and sinks,

7:59
washing machines, washing machine when we were kids are 4550 gallons alone. Now

8:10
they’re like eight. You want to talk through the recommended feed increases,

8:17
sure. So the first so we’re in year three of the bra tell us program or call it. So the first two years was 4% water, 8% sewer, and then years three and continuously, 3% increase we are on pace or on par to do that. Hopefully the assessment in future years doesn’t happen we’re seeing, but with that, we’re super comfortable,

8:55
and I think that the increases also would be the temporary water meter assembly and the back flower so something that’s that’s important that I didn’t quite realize, Matt, is that these i So we also have included on page four of the memo a list of water fees. And these are all the fees that were charged by the department. However, the only thing that is changing are the temporary water meter assembly and then the backflow maybe describe what shows are sure. So backflow prevention program that we have is it’s mandatory. It has to be the commercial level restaurants, census, fire suppression type things, it’s mandatory that they get tested twice a year, and we have to have a certified technical, tech or person that can do those tests. So that is a new, basically, program that we have implemented and we have a set last year, I think we had fees of $75 or requesting to go up 100

does 100 actually cover the cost? No, it does not. So we have, as a Select Board member, has been moving towards fees that actually reflect, that reflect the actual cost. So we looked

in the area, and we’re a little bit lower than some of the communities around us, but not too much older. Waltham, I think, is 125 or

10:29
150 or would it

10:30
be worth adjusting those 225 each?

10:34
It again, wouldn’t be we only one person going in Waltham, I think, has three. They have, like, 10 times more than we

10:44
have just just in general. So what you’re saying to prefer that we accept the list as presented. If we have these who, you

10:52
know, adjust next year, then we can, yeah, I

10:54
think we have an appetite for realistic fee structures. I think

10:57
one of the things we’re we’re seeing, we look at other towns, it’s like, is there a practice or a best practice? And other towns are potentially haven’t looked at their fee structures in a long time, or their fees are not covering their costs as well. So yeah, we have to take additional, I think, look at what our costs are and just be thoughtful about it.

11:16
So yeah, without asking to make a change now for next year, think about actual

11:21
costs. I do know that being number one in

11:25
MWA or cost is not a good place to be. Fair enough. Fair enough. Good point. We’ve got one hand raised online. Lisa parvoli,


I forgot about the fees. Could you have a similar motion for the fees for

14:13
the water? Yeah, move to accept the FY 26 water and these are these, water and sewer? No, just water. Water fees affected? Yes, effective. July 1, 2026 as presented.

14:45
Yeah, what does it move to rescind the prior vote and second, all in favor? Aye. Thank you for the

14:54
cap. Move to accept the FY 2026, water and sewer rates effective July 1. 2025 as per second. All right. Second, move to accept the

15:07
FY 26 water fees effective July 1. 2025 as presented. Second,

15:10
we briefly just talked that there will be a month on

15:19
flow. Oh, yes, just the we’ve operationalized this so that the the rates are effective July 1, but the first bills that will contain those new rates will be received in office, right? Because that is July, yeah, yeah. So there’s a there’s a bill, all

Raftelis, a national management consulting firm focusing on municipal government and utilities, to conduct a five-year rate study. The goal is to “establish financial sufficiency and viability” for the town’s water and sewer enterprise by determining the revenue needed to meet the operating expenses while retaining a healthy reserve.

Ratepayers will be facing steady rate hikes for the foreseeable future, said Raftelis vice president David Fox who told the Select Board Belmont “is very much not alone in this boat.” Nationally, water rates have been increasing by five percent and sewer by six percent for the past decade due to a litany of reasons, from inflationary pressures, repairing aging infrastructure, and declining consumption which results in a fall in revenue for municipalities and their utilities.

Even if costs were stable and you didn’t need to reinvest in the infrastructure, “you already would be facing an uphill battle with a declining revenue base” due to conservation measures and just a general drop off in usage, especially after the pandemic.

And for those communities that have been “kicking the can down the road” on rate increases, “eventually you’re going to get to a position where [Raftelis] will be meeting with a community where they are looking at a 35 percent year-to-year rate increase.

During most of the 2010s, Belmont’s water and sewer bills were some of the highest among its peer communities. With that knowledge, town officials began relying on retained earnings to keep rates unchanged to align charges with neighboring cities and towns.

But that reliance on reserves to subsidize residential water rates is no longer viable. In its analysis of water consumption and the expected increase in the assessments from the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, which supplies water to Belmont, Fox said the water fund’s retained earnings account is scheduled to run empty by the end of fiscal ’26.

Keeping the ratepayers in their mind

While it’s a simple equation to determine how high new rates should rise by understanding how much revenue is generated and what is needed to cover expected costs, “we don’t ever want to overshoot the rated and have the rates be artificially high,” said Fox. “We have to keep the burden of the ratepayers in the back of our mind.” 

One area of importance when calculating the new rate is maintaining a healthy retainer, the equivalent of a savings account, said Fox. The account is necessary to weather the financial storm of reduced consumption when there is a cool, wet spring or summer or a sudden capital demand on the infrastructure.

Raftelis forecast water and sewer operations and maintenance costs to increase three percent annually, with just over half of the water portion coming from MWRA assessments, while 71 percent of the sewer increase results from MWRA pricing. 

With yearly capital improvements expenditures expected at $1.36 million for water and $1.1 million for sewer and with both fund’s retained earnings line items heading towards zero in the next few years, “[a]dditional revenue is needed immediately in [fiscal ’24] to ensure [adequate] financial [growth],” wrote Fox for both water and sewer funds.

According to Fox, Belmont’s water rates should increase by four percent annually for five years. Raftelis recommends an eight percent increase in sewer rates in fiscal ’24 and ’25 before reverting to three percent increases in the remaining three years.

While rates are heading upward, the impact on residential users’ bills will be small under the Fox recommendations. The typical single-family household in the first year of the plan using approximately 200 cubic feet of water a month – the equivalent of 1,496 gallons – its annual combined water and sewer bill will increase by 4.5 percent, or $27.84, from $624.99 in fiscal ’23 to $652.84 in fiscal ’24. 

A two-family structure would see its bill rise by 5.8 percent ($76.77), and an apartment complex 6.3 percent ($158.33). The big jumps will be seen in the typical commercial site using approximately 7,500 gallons a month, where the average annual bill increases by $1,302.44 to $13,505.44. High-volume commercial users (15,000 gallons a month) can expect a $6,820.40 year-over-year hike.

When asked what conditions would be after the five years, Fox said if he was a betting man, “I’d say you’d still be looking at probably at a three percent increase every year.” With inflation to be around for longer than most people think and infrastructure needs always in the forefront of concerns, “I don’t think you’re going to get to a period after this five years whey you just don’t have an increase,” said Fox.